Видео

Wow dragon 🐲

🤣🤣Alien camera man

We had "The Beatles", free love and the Moon landing in the 60s. It felt good to be alive then.

😂 Cartoons

What kind of stuff were they smoking to come up with some of these bro

Awesome work

Wait... Is this supposed to real? Lol

I would have paid good money to fly the civilian version of the XB-70.

Launching off the back of the XB70 would have been the 'best' of these options, but not during cruise - all shockwave-interacting hell would have broken loose. Best to zoom-climb the XB70 so that the separation manoeuvre occurred at very low dynamic pressure.

Video's cronological order: 1-6th refuel from the bfr 2-TLI (trans lunar injection) 3-Low lunar orbit 4-Landing 5-Repeat it several times...

I guess we can stop funding NASA at this point.

Really bad cgi

Apakah disana ada sutradara bersama kru film?

L'uomo sulla luna,non c'è mai andato,e mai lo farà

The most beautiful aircraft ever made, at a time when the future promised so much. Anyway here we are in future and it sucks a bit

Nice to see the development of the Humanity .

Why doesn't the plane turn left due to payload?

🤗🤗🤗🤝🤝🤝👍👍👍

用超人电影的剪接拍攝手法加上首个登月，踏出人类的第一步回航谎言，以图唤起六十年代的傻爪的回忆來证明自己的偉大沒落帝国再度偉大起,來，😂😅

Хорошая графика. Збсь, чётка😂

Это что? Фейк? Или реально? Если реально , то !!@!!!!!!!!!!

This is one of the problems that face the current, & , future generations. We have technology now that is so realistic it gives rise to the conspiracy theorists who, upon seeing this, choose to believe that Americans actually DID NOT land on the moon, but this vision was impossible at that time!! I was a young man in Australia working for an American company at the time of Apollo 11 watching it unfold on black & white TV. When I see vision like this I am reminded how we can be manipulated into believing anything that is placed before us. Artificial intelligence is a threat to truth yet we seem unable to understand it as such. We are witnessing a Presidential election campaign in which blatent untruths are being promulgated as fact! I forecast the downfall of the 'American Century' if the American people cannot differentiate between truth & fiction! I am not American but I feel sad that such a beacon of hope has been corrupted in the pursuit of the mighty dollar!😢

CGI😅

वापस ye कैसे आया ye मिस्ट्री है

Always Perfecting The Art. ..Genius!

Everyday Astronaut did a video "Why Don’t They Launch Rockets From Aircraft?" and showed why its not the best way, especially if you want your rocket to carry any kind of meaningful payload into orbit.

Man these concept are wicked cool 😎

Graphic!…

Wow! That was so cool! Your graphics are the best!!

🤗🤗🤗🤝🤝🤝👍👍👍

Ok and what captured that .another rocket?

🤗🤗🤗🤝🤝🤝👍👍👍

Flying emperor penguin

I love NASA.

We shall see.! Soon

Great landing 👌

XB-70, my beloved.

What I would pay for a high quality metal model of the Valkyrie

Já disse que Elon Musk é um Extra Terrestre e vai logo usar a tecnologia de flutuação Magnética que desafiam as leis da nossa fisica em suas Naves Espaciais .

Are you freakin' ins.... scrub that :). Given the nature of it's demise, operating anything near this gorgeous beast would be suicidal and the first 2 concepts are completely ludicrous; but of the 3 options the last one is not and does pose an interesting option. Considering the operational ceiling (15km) and top speed (960kph) of the B52 vs the XB70 (23km and 3300kph) it would be interesting what performance advantages this would've offered the latter part of the X15 program.

I've heard rumors of something like this actually existing: Dark Horse.

They could just land it on a giant pillow type net something...because gravity and its about a thousand times easier 😊

Brings to mind the mythical, rumored XB-70esque Mother Ship that supposedly was a launch platform for post-SR71 reconnaissance speedsters.

neat

La idea de CONTAMINAR LOS OCEANOS ES ESTUPIDA.

HGA, In a word, Outstanding!!! The history of the XB-70, as a testbed for so many issues and solutions! Two working examples, & then the crash! Public relations gone wrong!!!! US government got cold feet. Money dried up and history! Missiles, was the excuse! The 🇺🇸 was moving too fast for some in the Whitehouse! Boeing won the argument! The B-52 lives, & the B-70, did not!!! The USAF wouldn't continue to fund, but NASA could have. Or maybe the CIA, their expense account doesn't get audited. To Dream!!!👍👍👍

Well that was different. Fanciful but fun.

Awesome! The XB-70 is one of my favorite aircraft that never was. Hypersonic launch platform kicks butt!!

Stunning video, as usual. You set the bar pretty high there :) However, some issues. The first "bottom drop" Dynasoar can't work for a number of reasons. Firstly the 'bubble' wouldn't allow the use of the aircraft landing gear so it can't actually take off in that position. Two is that the way the "compression lift" and flight dynamics mean you can't have that bubble blocking the body lift at high speed. Worse opening that bubble up would cause all sorts of dynamic issues and likely tear the bubble, space plane and aircraft into pieces. Similar issues with the 'under-wing' carry as the nose and body of the hypersonic test article would have impacted the aerodynamics of the XB-70 causing all sorts of control issues. (There was a concept for the B-70 to possibly carry two (2) "Skybolt" air launched ICBM's but they could only be carried near the wing roots and the B-70 could not exceed Mach 2 carrying them) And when are we going to get a video on the conical RBCC (Synerjet likely) single stage to orbit concept? Would especially like to see the VTVL design with the cargo/passenger area in the base of the vehicle :) The third design (aka on-the-back carry) is actually the only way to "launch" from a XB-70 as as like the SR-71 and drone combo (actually M71 and D21 but that's a nit) that's the only position where you have stable air and more importantly don't affect the performance of the XC-70 as much. (Like the Blackbird the Valkyrie always flew with a slight 'nose-up' angle-of-attack due to the nature of supersonic flight so the air over the back was "smoother" and the X-15 et-al would have more of a chance to gain stability before it interfaced with the XB-70 supersonic shock cone. I also get that your are using the SR-71/D-21 archived footage to model the X-15 separation but in fact the X-15 would have to have an auxiliary booster to keep it from simply falling rapidly backwards. the D-21 started its ramjet before separation so it could make a clean separation maneuver from the Mothership Lastly the XB-70 derived SST would have had the "hump" of the passenger cabin extend much further back in order to carry more passengers and freight.

I can’t imagine the amount of pressure needed to create a cavity big enough to be able to ignite the engine underwater.